Some Christians Are Turning Over a New Leaf with CBD Oil

CBD oil

This is an article I wrote for ChristianityToday.com, which first appeared on May 31, 2019.

Mandy Van Schyndel remembers May 16, 2018, as the day her daughter Emma laughed for the first time. A remarkable milestone for an 18-month-old who started her life on hospice at the Mayo Clinic, not expected to survive.

Even more remarkable that Emma’s parents credit a compound from a plant banned for more than 80 years with calming the disquieting symptoms of Emma’s conditions.

Faced with severe brain damage after suffering a bilateral stroke in utero, Emma’s diagnoses mounted: microcephaly, porencephaly, spastic quadriplegia cerebral palsy. When her uncontrollable seizures started three months later, a fourth diagnosis was added: Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS).

“It’s a beast,” Mandy explained. “It’s one of the worst forms of epilepsy.”

As Emma’s seizures intensified, she experienced up to 12 cluster seizures daily. “It was really sad,” Mandy said. “She was losing some of the skills she had. She wasn’t smiling anymore and she wasn’t cooing as much.”

The disruptive nature of LGS took its toll on the family of seven in Kaukauna, Wisconsin. “It was hard to go to church,” admitted Mandy, “because if she fell asleep I knew she would wake up and have a seizure. And it wasn’t like a few seconds. It would cluster for an hour.”

After trying “many different concoctions of medications,” including steroid injections and 10 months on a ketogenic diet—none of which provided relief—the family faced reality.

“We went from trying to find seizure freedom to just trying to find any kind of reduction—to increase her quality of life.”

That’s when Mandy brought up the topic of hemp-based CBD oil with Emma’s neurologist. “I said [to him], ‘I know this is a taboo subject,’” said Mandy. “He said, ‘It’s not taboo. There’s really something to it.’ That was a nice reassurance to hear.”

What Is CBD?

Short for cannabidiol, CBD is one of the primary compounds or cannabinoids found in both hemp and marijuana. Though cousins in the cannabis family with a similar appearance, they have different chemical profiles. Unlike marijuana, hemp is non-psychoactive, meaning it can’t get you high and is legally defined as containing 0.3% or less tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the controversial psychoactive component in marijuana.

Though hemp cultivation has been legal at the federal level since January 1, 2019 (it was lumped in with marijuana and declared illegal in 1937), some states continue to grapple with the legal learning curve. And while lawmakers wrestle over regulation, or the lack of it, motivated consumers and clinicians are doing their best to do their own research in the caveat emptor CBD market, which is estimated to reach $2 billion by 2020 and $16 billion by 2025.

From chewing gum and chocolate to mascara and lotion, CBD can now be found in a multitude of everyday consumables. Has your favorite coffee shop added CBD-infused cold brew coffee to the menu? Is there CBD honey at your local farmer’s market? Maybe you’ve even seen ads for pet treats with CBD?

While new storefronts and online retailers set up shop for eager customers, established wellness brands seem to be coming on board as well. Young Living Essential Oils announced to distributors they plan to release a hemp CBD-infused essential oil sometime in 2019.

“Hemp-based CBD oil is not the same as marijuana. You get the anti-inflammatory [effects], the pain relief without the high,” said Troy Spurrill, a chiropractor with a focus on functional neurology and founder of Synapse, a clinic based in Eagan, Minnesota. “For some people, it really is and has been a lifesaver.”

Seizure Free with CBD

After several months of searching for a quality product she felt comfortable with, Mandy found a high-quality, full-spectrum CBD oil.

“I honestly didn’t have super high hopes,” she admitted, “but I felt the pull to try it.” A friend encouraged her to try it with Emma. “She kept saying, ‘Just try it. It’s not going to hurt her.’”

Within three days of giving their toddler two drops of CBD oil under her tongue twice a day, Mandy said they saw a “dramatic decrease” in Emma’s seizures. “It felt like the fog was lifted,” she said. “My child was awake under there. Now she’s laughing and smiling every single day!”

Emma went from having up to 12 seizures per day to going six months without one. “It’s miraculous,” Mandy said. “It baffles me that that minute amount can combat one of the most severe forms of epilepsy.”

Mandy said Emma’s therapists also remark on the significant changes in her daughter from a year ago. “She has more purposeful movement. She’s interacting with her peers. She’s playing with toys spontaneously. None of those things were happening before CBD oil,” said Mandy. “You can’t tell me that’s all a coincidence.”

It’s not a coincidence based on research either. Emma’s response seems consistent with the results of clinical trials, which showed CBD oil contributed to a significant reduction in the severity and frequency of severe epileptic seizures.

Those findings led to FDA approval last summer of Epidiolex, a pharmaceutical-grade CBD oil with trace amounts of THC, for seizures associated with two severe forms of epilepsy—Dravet syndrome and LGS—which Emma has. It’s the first time since the formation of the FDA that a drug from the cannabis plant has received approval.

The Forerunner

The controversy surrounding the plant restricted research about it for many decades, but that didn’t stop Nobel Prize nominee Raphael Mechoulam from engaging in the process of inquiry and discovery, starting in the 1960s.

A Holocaust survivor and professor of medicinal chemistry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mechoulam identified the first two cannabinoids (THC and CBD) and discovered the endocannabinoid system (ECS)—cannabinoids that the bodies of humans and vertebrates make on their own.

Considered one of the founding fathers of cannabinoid research whose work is covered in the documentary, “The Scientist,” Mechoulam has published hundreds of articles on medical cannabis, endocannabinoids, and CBD, advocating for CBD’s anti-inflammatory, anti-anxiety, and neuroprotective benefits. In 1980 Mechoulam and his colleagues found CBD decreased seizures in epileptic patients.

During the last few decades, more than 100 cannabinoids have been identified in the cannabis plant, but THC and CBD are still the most abundant and attract the most attention.

CBD works with the body’s endocannabinoid system, which Spurrill explained “is a form of communication,” since it has cannabinoid receptors throughout the entire body, many of which are in the nervous and immune systems. Research suggests that may be one reason many CBD oil users often report experiencing benefits for many types of conditions. (CB1 receptors are found mainly in the central nervous system and brain, while CB2 receptors are found in the rest of the body, including the immune and muscular systems.) Those who experience “runners’ high,” for example, are feeling the effects of the endocannabinoid system at work.

Tiptoeing into CBD Clinical Use

Though aware of CBD over a decade ago, Spurrill was reluctant to bring it into his functional medicine clinic.

“I was not for it in the beginning,” he admitted. “I had the same concerns as a lot of ChristiansI did not want to be a part of anything that promoted [marijuana use]. But then I saw the science and research, so I switched gears.”

In the last four years, Spurrill, who sees patients from 48 states and 12 countries, has documented results with more than 100 patients taking hemp CBD oil, seeing the biggest effects in people with insomnia, pain, anxiety, and seizures. “We’ve not had one problem with it.”

But he cautions anyone looking into hemp CBD oil to make sure there’s no THC in it since there are formulas that mix CBD from hemp and marijuana. “You have to know what you’re working with, because there are people who just want the high and they’re rationalizing the science that’s come out on CBD. They’re trying to escape life. For Christians, we don’t need to.”

Some evidence even suggests hemp CBD oil can decrease addictive marijuana use and help pain patients addicted to opioids regain sobriety.

In one case, hemp CBD oil was “a game changer,” said Spurrill, who helped a suicidal patient whose multiple surgeries left him in chronic pain and addicted to prescription painkillers. “He got off the opiates and is alive and doing well today. It managed the pain. It ended up being a big tool for me to help him.”

Christians Using CBD Oil

Despite the gaps in research and regulation, many people are turning to CBD in its various formulations—oils taken internally as well as capsules, topical creams, and edibles.

Kim Nelles, a Dallas-area mom, teacher, and former Young Life staff member, turned to CBD oil originally to help her husband, Brian, a veteran struggling with PTSD, after other biomedical and therapeutic options were ruled out.

“I wanted help. I didn’t want a vice,” said Kim. “I didn’t want to be any sort of stumbling block for anyone. The more I was researching, [I saw] these are two totally different things.”

But she was determined to find a pure form of hemp CBD oil. “I’m not a granola girl at all, but on this one thing I’m fastidious about making sure it’s organic and grown in the US. You have to know what you’re buying. Some folks have bought inferior products and haven’t had any sort of effect.” Together, the couple began taking a formula applied under the tongue and noticed it helped bring a sense of calmness.

Bethany Kremer, a caregiver in New Haven, Connecticut, and a friend of the Van Schyndels, started taking CBD oil in April 2018 and soon noticed three benefits. “For the first time since I was a teenager, I don’t have any cramps with my period. I lived on ibuprofen and Tylenol. CBD oil took away those cramps. Those have not returned.”

She also noticed improved sleep, as she wasn’t waking up as often in the night, and said it helped with her appetite and food cravings.

After a year of using CBD oil for stiffness and tension, Sheila, who preferred not to be identified with her last name, has since discontinued it. “I simply find I don’t need it,” she said, “I found that I had an increase in my sense of wellness, a sense of shalom, and the stiffness I used to feel went away.”

“I’m not against using it again,” she added. “As we grow and dialogue with [God], we’ll know what to do with continued use. … It’s a matter of listening to our internal wisdom and Father’s voice.”

Discernment Is Key

It all comes down to discernment, Spurrill said, citing one of his personal guidelines: “If God made it, it’s good. If man altered, just beware. That’s true for everything, including CBD oils.”

Though Scripture doesn’t mention CBD specifically, the Bible does give us guidance with wine: drink but don’t get drunk (Eph. 5:18). Paul also told Timothy to use wine medicinally (1 Tim. 5:23). And in his first public miracle, Jesus turned water into wine, not Welch’s.

And then there’s caffeine. While a few faith groups shun this addictive stimulant (once labeled the “devil’s drink”), it would be hard to find a church that doesn’t own a coffee pot.

Both Ezekiel 47:12 and Revelation 22:2 speak of leaves being used for healing—verses that many Christians lean on for spiritual assurance when using plant-based therapeutics, such as herbs and essential oils. On the latter, Samaritan Ministries wrote a seriesencouraging spiritual discernment as well.

Genesis recounts on the third day of creation God created seed-bearing plants, which would include cannabis plants. Regardless of how humans have used, confused, abused, or misused God’s good creation, the biblical principle still remains: God’s fingerprints were there first.

As Andy Crouch wrote for CT, “Christians despise no created thing. The [cannabis] plant is a part of a world that was declared good by its Maker every step along the way.”

However, doctors are not equally informed about CBD, and many are on a learning curve. Patients who expect their healthcare professionals to be well versed on both the benefits and risks of CBD oil may be disappointed.

Christianity Today reached out to physicians, some of whom were Christians, and found several were either not aware of the differences between hemp and marijuana or hadn’t studied it yet. Some thought CBD oil was the same as medical marijuana (which it is not) and a few either dismissed it as a fad or hadn’t heard of it. The Christian Medical and Dental Association recently published a piece on medical marijuana, though in a parenthetical note the author notes it’s the CBD component in the marijuana that provides some benefit.

Walt Larimore, a physician and author of several books including God’s Design for the Highly Healthy Person, publicly answered a few questions recently about CBD oil on his blog. Yet while he acknowledged that some research suggests CBD oil can help with certain conditions, the post also mistakenly referred to hemp as marijuana.

Nonetheless, Larimore pointed to a 2017 Penn Medicine study that revealed one of the consequences inadequate regulation and oversight in a booming CBD market can have. The study found that 70 percent of CBD products sold online are either over- or under-labeled, due to the lack of standards.

The reality of mislabeling is why the purity of the sourcing and processing of hemp is important, said Spurrill, since the therapeutic benefits of CBD “can be negated if it’s not done properly. If it’s not a clean source, then there’s all kinds of problems,” such as pesticides, fungus, and molds.

Spurrill added that some types of people should be careful using CBD, including individuals with low dopamine, excessive sleepiness, low blood sugar, impulsivity, and anger.

“It doesn’t mean it won’t work. It means it could drive things down a certain path. Just because you read something is good, it means it may be good for a percentage of people in the right time and the right environment,” he cautioned. “All of that has to be considered.”

In his “Ask Dr. Walt” column, Larimore offers advice to anyone looking to try CBD oil: “Start with a very low dose and then very slowly increase how much you take.”

Removing the Stigma

Having a place where Christians can “thoughtfully explore and scripturally examine” CBD is important, said Natalie Gillespie, editor in chief for GodsGreenery.com, the first online CBD educational resource for Christians looking for information and research.

“When I first heard of CBD, I dismissed it immediately,” Gillespie wrote. “No way, Jose, was I going to use something that was lumped into the same plant family as pot. … Then I began to hear … so many stories, of the benefits my own friends found when using it. … That led to my inner questions. And the examination of my beliefs. I realized I have developed a trust, a faith, in Western medicine. … We are discovering every day that what God designs is better than what man makes.”

In an interview, Gillespie said the goal for the site, which launched in November 2018, is “to create a conversation and to take the stigma away from even being able to talk about it. The last thing you want is to feel like you have to hide.” She wants it to be “a place for thoughtful discovery through a biblical lens and community,” which includes talking with pastors about CBD.

Of those pastors interviewed, many were unfamiliar with it. But one pastor who tried CBD oil, Neal Locke of First Presbyterian Church in El Paso, Texas, said, “There are a great many things in God’s creation that are useful and intended for our benefit. … I think CBD oil falls into that category—potentially useful and for our benefit, but subject to wise and intelligent usage.”

As for the Van Schyndels, the relief CBD oil brought Emma gave the whole family freedom to enjoy life together again—from baseball games to going on vacation to enjoying boat rides.

“She giggles when we go fast,” said Mandy. “She loves the wind blowing in her hair. We were never able to bring Emma along because of her seizures and now we’re able to do that.”

“Emma is a true warrior,” said Mandy of her now two-year-old. “She’s one of God’s miracles. Her middle name is Grace because she’s truly here by God’s grace.”

***

Photo by Stefan Rodriguez on Unsplash

Why We Need to Know About This “Vaccine Court” (aka “Secret Court”) & What MN Lawmakers are Doing About It Now

Reps. Eric Lucero and Jeremy Munson (middle), with parents of vaccine-injured children who worked to bring this Resolution forward to hold vaccine manufacturers liable again.

Q: If a press conference at the State Capitol falls on a busy #TuesdayNewsDay, and no mainstream media outlet in attendance reports on it, did it still happen?

A: Yes. Yes, it did.

I was there.

And so were several other reporters, representing WCCO Radio, KTSP, FOX, Star Tribune and more. A couple attendees even stormed out in the first few minutes.

In this press conference on Tuesday, May 14, MN lawmakers brought forward a common sense Resolution asking “the President and Congress to hold vaccine manufacturers liable for design defects that result in adverse side effects from vaccines.”  (See HF 2825, HF 2862, SF 2781, SF 2831 and SF 2911.)

In total, nearly 3 dozen legislators from both parties, including doctors and nurses, signed the Resolution. (Senate files can only have 5 signatures each, hence the 3 SFs.)

Rep. Jeremy Munson kicked off the conference explaining the backstory that led to “Vaccine Court”:

“In 1986 there were 7 vaccines routinely administered to American children. Yet there were so many catastrophic injuries caused by the schedule that some of the vaccine manufacturers threatened to stop producing [vaccines], due to the large damage rewards that they were ordered to pay when people were injured.  So the pharmaceutical industry heavily lobbied Congress to pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. This unprecedented law established a compensation program…to compensate those killed or harmed by vaccines.”

Why does this Resolution matter?

After all, holding pharmaceutical manufacturers of vaccines liable for injuries caused by their design defects seems reasonable, right?

If your car has a defect that causes accidents and deaths and is eventually recalled, you’d want the maker held accountable to fix the recall on your vehicle and improve their product going forward.

If you heard that the baby food you fed your child was found to be contaminated by the manufacturer and your child was severely poisoned, you’d want the company to be held liable for damages and reimburse your child’s doctor visits, hospital stay, etc.

If your child was one of the 32 confirmed who died in Fisher-Price’s defective infant seat, you’d probably want to sue the company who made the defective product.

Not so with vaccines.

Today, when you or your child is injured or dies from the ingredients in vaccines, you cannot sue the manufacturer or take them to court.

Instead, you have to go up against the United States Department of Justice and sue the federal government in “Vaccine Court.”

Vaccine manufacturers are the only industry in this country that has enjoyed a complete liability shield ever since the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 went into effect October 1, 1988.

Just as vaccine injuries continued to occur prior to 1986, they have only increased, since the vaccine schedule in the U.S. is up from 7 in 1986 to 72 now.

Since 1988, over $4.1 billion has been paid out by you and I and other taxpayers in 30 years through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

That’s one of the many realities this press conference brought to light.

But this was no anti-vaccine event.

Kristin Sullivan, a parent and volunteer advocate with the Vaccine Safety Council of Minnesota pointed out that this “is not [about] whether or not you should vaccinate, it’s really about putting liability back onto Pharma.”

Rep. Jeremy Munson noted that the purpose of this Resolution is not to change a law in Minnesota. It’s to urge Congress to restore the NCVIA back to its original intent.

Let’s unpack the NCVIA a bit here. Because it can seem complex if you’re new to this topic.

When Congress passed the NCVIA in 1986, it was well-intentioned and required certain provisions:

  1. Swift justice and generous compensation for the victims.
  2.  ALL injuries and adverse effects from vaccines were to be reported by medical personnel to a national database, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
  3. Congress charged HHS with the responsibility to improve vaccine safety, by requiring them to submit biannual reports to Congress.

But now 30+ years later and NONE of the above has been followed. Instead:

  1. “Vaccine Court” is neither swift nor generous. At the conference Wayne Rohde, author of The Vaccine Court: The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and father of a 21-year-old who was injured by vaccines at 13 months, explained that the process is “litigious and highly adversarial.” It can take up 4–10 years before a decision is reached or the case dismissed.
  2. A government-commissioned study by Harvard researchers found that only 1% of injuries and deaths from vaccines are actually reported to VAERS! (in other words 99% of injuries and deaths go unreported.)  And many healthcare personnel don’t even know about it, much less the requirement to submit reports to it.
  3. In 30+ years, no safety studies have been submitted to HHS, a lawsuit found.

Also speaking at the press conference was MN Attorney Randall Knutson, who handles anywhere from 35–50 cases at a time, representing people suffering vaccine injury.

Knutson said “Vaccine Court” is pretty much “Secret Court” since so few know about it.

He added that many of the people he represents die of their injuries before they get to compensation.

Knutson also pointed out:

Because the vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued, there is no motivation for them to test [their vaccines] for safety. There’s no reason for them to do it.”

Main Media Outlets Largely Ignored This

I watched for coverage of the event on Tuesday, planning to write a follow up piece here like I did on What Really Happened at the Minnesota Freedom Rally.

But few mainstream outlets touched it.

So instead of a “Here’s what they left out” post, I can report that 6 days later, most seem to have left it out entirely, and some, well…they just left!

I’ll let you draw your own conclusions from that.

I do want to give the reporters who stayed some benefit of the doubt, since there was a lot happening at the State Capitol that day (like stalemate budget talks and committee meetings before the legislative session ends) and other major news dominating the evening news cycle. (More on that below.)

Or maybe they just didn’t know what to do with a common-sense bipartisan vaccine topic that didn’t fit into the mainstream news’ dichotomized and polarizing frame that only sees two colors: pro-vaccine vs. anti-vaccine.

But despite the lack of mainstream media coverage, word of this Resolution quickly spread online on multiple local and national social media pages. 

Locally, Megan Olson with Alpha News reported on it.

Nancy Hokkanen wrote in depth on it, too. (Including how a Star Tribune reporter essentially tried to hijack the conversation.)

I’d encourage you to read their excellent reporting, as I don’t need to recap their articles here.

Radio Host Sue Jeffers discussed the press conference 3 days before the event, interviewing Sarah Copeland, a nurse and mother of a vaccine-injured child, about her experiences and involvement in this issue.

Capitol Report included key points from the press conference as well, starting at the 8:50 mark.

The question I ask now: Are Republicans correcting a 30+ year mistake here?

While some may see this Resolution as only a Republican-supported topic, there were some smart DFL signers as well, who can see beyond the two colors of pro- or anti-vaccine.

The way I see it, it seems appropriate for GOP lawmakers to take a lead on this Resolution. It was their party, after all, that allowed this 33-year mistake in the first place.

It was Republican President Ronald Reagan who reluctantly signed the 1986 law, under heavy pressure from lobbyists.

And in 2011, it was largely “conservative” Supreme Court justices that ruled in favor of protecting pharmaceutical corporations and removed the public’s ability to sue in civil court in SCOTUS’ Bruesewitz v. Wyeth case (Only “liberal” justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg dissented).

We all make mistakes. But wise are those who recognize it and seek to correct it.

So kudos to our MN GOP lawmakers for standing up now to take responsibility for what their party’s predecessors did not have the guts to do.

A True Tuesday News Day for Medical Freedom and Accountability

Also on Tuesday, May 14th, several thousand people, including Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Del Big Tree, gathered for a rally in Albany, New York to stand up for the vaccine injured and support vaccine rights.

MN Survivors Suing the Vatican … a parallel for vaccine-injured survivors?

Lastly, one of the main stories that dominated Minnesota news on Tuesday was Minnesota survivors of clergy abuse suing the Vatican, asking for information on thousands of sexual abuse cases that they say were kept secret by the church.

We’re willing to hear their stories and believe them now. But it wasn’t that long ago no one was willing to talk about that reality.

For decades the church and media kept a lid on it.

Individuals and children who were harmed by predatory priests were silenced, marginalized, bullied and/or excommunicated for speaking up about their experiences and asking for justice.

Sound familiar?

There is truly nothing new under the sun.

In one of the scenes of one of my favorite films, Best Picture-winner Spotlight, Attorney Mitchell Garabedian (played by the amazing of Stanley Tucci) talks to Mike Rezendes, one of the Boston Globe reporters, about how the Catholic Church covered up the sexual abuse of children for decades.

Mark my words, Mr. Rezendes. If it takes a village to raise a child. It takes a village to abuse one.”

Mark those words, dear reader. Mark those words.

That’s why this Resolution matters.

What are your thoughts? Do you support this Resolution? Should manufacturers be held liable for design defects?